Sun 30 Apr 2006
The Glorious Cause by Jeff Shaara is a novel of the Revolutionary War, told through the eyes of the major participants: George Washington, Nathaniel Greene, Charles Cornwallis and the Marquis de Lafayette, just to name a few. This novel, like most of Jeff Shaara’s novels, falls into the style of his father’s Pultizer-prize winning work, The Killer Angels, that is to say, transforming historical events into drama with the major players as the stars.
As in all good dramas there is a hero, and unsurprisingly, it is George Washington, the stoic, intrepid leader who is beyond reproach (by the reader, at least). Although Shaara somewhat falls into a bit of hero worship when it comes to Washington, the depiction of the strong, decisive leader is not too far off the mark.
Unlike most dramas, there is not one single antagonist for the hero/reader to overcome. While Washington’s antagonist may literally be the British Army, whether it be Howe, Clinton or Cornwallis commanding, I felt that for the reader and perhaps for Washington and Co. as well, the main antagonist was Old World aristocracy. From the chambers of King George III to the palace of Versailles, Amercian generals and delegates are seen to be fighting the aristocratic order to gain credit and recognition from the French and independence from the British.
In summation, this is one of the most powerful books I have read about the Revolution. The reader is able to feel the pain of loss for both sides of the conflict. These men shaped our lies in measures unimaginable and their stories are told faithfully in this novel: Cornwallis, the tortured man under incompetent leadership who longs for his sickly wife, Washington, who sees nothing but early failure but never loses faith, Franklin, who must secure French support despite the danger the Revolution poses to the French monarchy.

May 2nd, 2006 at 7:26 pm
I had a few questions based on your excellent review. Is it a novel (told from multiple perspective) or is it non-fiction or perhaps a combination of the two? In any case sounds good I’ll run by Barnes and Noble and check it out soon.
May 2nd, 2006 at 7:34 pm
It is based on the letters and public accounts surrounding the events. Much of the dialogue is ad-libbed, making it fiction, but the history and circumstances surrounding the dialogue are historically accurate.
May 5th, 2006 at 7:57 pm
Nice review. I read The Killer Angels many years back and enjoy the Shaara’s style of writing. In this book, how close does the reader get to the foot soliders view? I mean, is the focus on the Generals and well known figures or do you also get to hear from lower level figures?
May 6th, 2006 at 4:37 pm
To answer Michael’s qustion, not as close as I would like. The primary viewpoint is from the Generals and assorted other major players. The perspective of the common soldier is absent. I would enjoy a memoir from a common Continental, but have yet to find one.